ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Comparative effects of repeated-sprint and plyometric
training on aerobic capacity and short-term maximal
intensity efforts in youth team-sport athletes
More details
Hide details
1
Ministry of National Education, Turkey
2
Faculty of Sports Sciences, Erzurum Technical University,
Turkey
Submission date: 2025-03-20
Final revision date: 2025-11-30
Acceptance date: 2025-12-29
Publication date: 2026-06-30
Corresponding author
Selim Asan
Faculty of Sports Sciences, Erzurum Technical University, Turkey
TRENDS in Sport Sciences 2026;33(2)
KEYWORDS
TOPICS
ABSTRACT
Introduction:
Repeated-sprint training (RST) and plyometric
jump training (PJT) are key methods in youth conditioning,
targeting distinct yet complementary systems – RST enhances
metabolic efficiency and fatigue tolerance, whereas PJT develops
muscle power and neural activation.
Aim of the study:
This study
aimed to directly compare the effects of RST and PJT on aerobic
capacity and short-term maximal intensity performance in
youth team-sport athletes.
Material and methods:
Thirtyone
trained athletes aged 15-17 years participated and were
randomly allocated to either the RST or PJT group. Training
sessions were conducted three times per week for eight weeks.
The RST protocol consisted of short, maximal sprints with
limited recovery to stimulate aerobic and anaerobic pathways,
whereas the PJT protocol incorporated multi-joint jumping
drills to improve explosive strength. Performance measures
included aerobic fitness (Yo-Yo Intermittent Recovery Test
Level 1 [Yo-Yo IR1]), sprint ability, jump height, lower-body
strength, and agility, all of which were assessed before and
after the intervention.
Results:
The RST group showed greater
improvements in aerobic capacity and repeated-sprint ability,
including a 2.8-unit increase in Yo-Yo IR1 and a 9.8-s reduction
in total sprint time. In contrast, the PJT group demonstrated
larger gains in jump performance (CMJ +6.1 cm; SJ +6.4 cm)
and lower-body strength (+6.0 kg). Performance decrement
improved by 7.9% in RST and by 1.8% in PJT, while agility
remained unchanged in both groups.
Conclusions:
Both RST
and PJT proved effective but in distinct performance domains.
RST predominantly enhanced aerobic and fatigue-related
parameters, whereas PJT improved neuromuscular strength
and explosive power. Integrating both training modalities
within a structured periodization model may optimize the
comprehensive development of youth athletes. Future research
should address longer training durations, different maturation
stages, and sport-specific applications to refine evidence-based
conditioning strategies for young players.